FFF 63 and Friday Faithfuls essay on AI

white crystal twinkles
on the night before Christmas
walking in the air

Jim Adams asks Friday Faithfuls to write about anything related to AI. This is going to be stream of consciousness.

The first thing coming to mind is a movie I watched recently, “Eddington,” where one major conflict between the sheriff of the town and the mayor who is running for re-election is the proposed data center for the dying community of Eddington. The mayor is in cahoots with corporate money people, and the sheriff thinks human needs should take precedence over the energy-sucking behemoth they want to animate in the desert.

The next thing is when I use search engines, at the top are a litany of AI-generated questions and answers. I have to scroll down further and further and get to non-AI options. I’ve been told I can turn this feature off, and I’m sure I have on a browser, but not on this browser. This is a reminder to myself to do it. I have to ask the question, will there come a time when the only option will be to take an AI’s generated response? I feel certain, if the AI trajectory is not interrupted, that the answer will be yes.

Reading Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s book, “Nobody’s Girl,” it kind of surprised me that so many of the men Maxwell and Roberts trafficked her to were scientists. As much money as these two traffickers and suspected blackmailers had, and the knowledge that the areas where the sexual encounters with minors were being videotaped, it isn’t too far of a stretch to see that if they hadn’t been stopped, they could have controlled technologies that controlled the planet. Things like Deep Mind AI. I also learned that the two facilitators of the trafficking and blackmailing enterprise were not isolated from their network of world power players. Virginia described these players coming to Epstein to get guidance. He wasn’t just a sex addict that needed to abuse minors three times a day. He was a hub of information. How many of these names will be redacted from the millions of records (each record can contain varying numbers of pages)? Can we hope to see an unredacted, full release? Question: with so many records on file, going back twenty or more years, why were the fed, state, and local governments sitting on them? Why did it take victims stepping out of the shadows and speaking up to to the media get them moving on it? Why were their cries for help ignored for so long?

I can’t help but observe and wonder why humans are devoting so much time and energy into making machines that are better at being logical, or “machine-like” in their thinking. As we become more under the control of machines, it is humans that will be expected to adapt to the way of the machine thinking, not machines adapting to ours. As our cognitive output becomes more machine-like, will we become less human? What is it that makes us human? It’s an important question. We need to figure it out sooner rather than later, as we need to value those things and find ways to shield them from AI as it continues to encroach on our humanity.

Thanks, Jim, for the prompt. These things have been rolling around in my head; your prompt gave me a chance to try and articulate them.

If anyone’s wondering what the poem at the top is about, it was written in response to a prompt on substack of “snowman.” It was not written by AI.  The top image, however, is a screen shot from a game almost certainly AI-assisted.

Hope everyone’s having a good day after Christmas.

23 Comments Add yours

  1. Steve's avatar Steve says:

    Very well said, Lisa! To your point about machines one day being in control, the Captcha function in which a machine asks us to prove we are human seems like too much foreshadowing. It’s all scary, but people flock to thieving platforms like ChatGPT, completely unaware that much of what it spews out is inaccurate, and using others’ efforts without paying for them. A precursor to a postmodern form of enslavement?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Steve's avatar Steve says:

      Oops, I was on a tirade and forgot to thank you for your wishes and hope you are enjoying the day, too. 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Lisa or Li's avatar Lisa or Li says:

        :) You are welcome, and I am.

        Liked by 1 person

    2. Lisa or Li's avatar Lisa or Li says:

      Steve, I appreciate your comment and can see you’ve given it some thought also. “Thieving platforms” is a perfect descriptor and so is “spews.” Have you seen the movie, “The Matrix”? I can’t help but think that’s where we’re headed.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Steve's avatar Steve says:

        Thanks, Lisa. I have indeed given it a lot of thought, and continue to as I keep hearing of more settings on apps and programs that default to sharing one’s content for AI use. 🤬

        The “thieving” bit is a riff on a friend’s descriptor of AI, which you probably have seen me share before, “The World-burning Plagiarism Machine.” “Spews”… well, that’s self-explanatory!

        I did see The Matrix many years ago, and feel you are correct there.

        Liked by 1 person

        1. Lisa or Li's avatar Lisa or Li says:

          You’re welcome. I haven’t seen the setting on apps you mention but I haven’t been looking for it either. If it’s in the very find print, where you check a box at the end to agree, that’s probably why.

          Liked by 1 person

          1. Steve's avatar Steve says:

            I get what you mean about the virtual scrolls of fine print you have to “sign” so that you can get past. Ugh. I think one needs a law degree to understand all that.

            No, unfortunately the problem is the particular settings I’m referring to are usually buried deep in app or device settings. I’ve railed before (and you probably saw it, and have heard it from me ad nauseam 🙄) how WordPress has moved around the setting that opts you out of your content being used to train AI, so that it’s hard to find and disable. The default on the setting is “yes.” Each time I go to find it to send a link to someone, it’s gone, moved someplace else and of course always counterintuitive. 🤬

            The other day I was on a rare visit into Instagram to see a reel on one of the grandbabies, then some others played automatically, all iPhone hacks, some for saving battery, etc., but some were privacy and security – and one was similar to the WP AI shenanigans.

            I would do a blog post on this sometime if I could find a song to complement it! 🤭

            Well… there I go again… I’ll see myself out… 😂

            Liked by 1 person

  2. Thanks for sharing all of your interesting thoughts about AI. Lisa.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Lisa or Li's avatar Lisa or Li says:

      You are welcome, Jim.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. tiredhamster's avatar tiredhamster says:

    Maybe one of the purposes of this AI-push is to make us less human. We have no inherent value to the top 0.1%; we’re just a means to an end for them. And if we were to become “less human” then we would be easier to manage, easier to direct, and easier to dispose of. And if we’re all machines slaving away then we’re less likely to rebel. I’m reminded of that Black Mirror episode where society comprised of workers living in glass boxes surrounded by adverts. No individuality or community, just workers and consumers, all to keep the machine chugging along.

    With AI they can feed us slop to keep us satiated. They can also use AI to spy on us. They are trying to use AI to devalue what it means to be a person be stripping away art, privacy and our shared reality. In the short-term, they will likely to succeed. In the long-term, humanity will win out in the end. I hope.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Lisa or Li's avatar Lisa or Li says:

      TH, thank you for sharing your insights on AI and those at the top 0.1%. I agree with all you say.

      Like

  4. What I do in google while searching is for example… ifI’m searching for… prairie dogs -ai
    and that gives me the answer without AI with the -ai…it works with google but I’m not sure about the other search engines.
    I think AI is a great tool…a great tool but ONLY a tool but again….it will be/and is overused as everything else is. Yea I’m sure one day we won’t be able to turn it off.
    When I go to a Microsoft Portal to work…their AI wants to take over and it takes forever just to get past it.
    So yea I’m getting tired of it and it’s only just begun.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Lisa or Li's avatar Lisa or Li says:

      Oh, didn’t know about that “-ai” thanks much, Max. I use duck duck go. Will try it and see what happens. I am not sure video games of the quality I have seen can be created without AI but I don’t know anything about it. Not sure what a Microsoft Portal is, but it sounds irritating!

      Liked by 1 person

      1. It is irritating! Basically the portal is a place I go if I need to change someone’s password or somthing like that…they made what used to be easy a chore now….

        Liked by 1 person

    2. Lisa or Li's avatar Lisa or Li says:

      p.s. I just tested it out in duck duck go and it worked. Thanks so much, Max. You just made my night (it’s after 2 a.m. right now so probably should have said my morning :)

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Cool! I didn’t know that it worked on other search engines…they must have made it universal …cool! We both learned something! lol.

        Liked by 1 person

  5. Violet Lentz's avatar Violet Lentz says:

    I think the drive toward more intelligent machines- is precisely geared toward more efficient control of the masses. Universe willing, I will exit stage left before it really gets a foothold.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Carol anne's avatar Carol anne says:

    I am going to read nobody’s girl soon too Li! It is on my list of books that I will be reading over the next 2 months. X

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Lisa or Li's avatar Lisa or Li says:

      Good, CA. Knowing your trauma history, I would pace yourself in reading. It can be overwhelming (and triggering.)

      Like

Leave a reply to Violet Lentz Cancel reply