#FPQ 7 Social Media Site Censorship OK?


Fandango’s Provocative Question #7 this week is:

Do you believe that social media sites should be able to censor what people post on their sites and ban content creators from posting? Or do you consider such actions to be a violation of freedom of speech, which is guaranteed as a right in the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution?”

A social media site owns the site and can choose to censor if they choose to censor. If a person who creates content on a social media site objects to being censored or seeing others censored, they may try to organize other content creators to plea to the site to change things, but if they are unsuccessful then they have a decision to make. They can continue to create content at the site with the knowledge that censorship is lurking in the shadows and is ready to pounce, which may stifle their creativity, or they can choose to leave that social media site and create their content elsewhere.

I do think anyone who is in the business of hosting multi-media for creative content needs to be very careful about what and who they choose to censor. There needs to be as little censorship as possible. Content that advocates hate crimes, criminal enterprise involving children or other vulnerable victims is content that the business would be prudent to censor, for liability reasons if for no other. Using patreon for an example, what if the entity they chose to censor was advocating the selling of children?

As free as we would like to see ourselves be, as protected by the First Amendment, inherent in the US Constitution are the limits, as outlined. Complete “freedom” wouldn’t bother with any kind of document that limits. We are inherently limited, and that’s ok.

That said, if there comes a time when sites start censoring for other than the bare minimum, we need to be very worried. We’ve already seen abuses in the insurance and healthcare systems, where individuals are denied procedures, medications, etc. because of religious beliefs surrounding control of others’ bodies. We must be ever-vigilant when it comes to maintaining our civil rights.


7 Comments Add yours

  1. Paula Light says:

    Good answer! I like how you tie in the health insurance issue. Imo if it were separated from our employment, something I’ve long favored, most of this bickering over what is “offensive” to cover would be moot.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. badfinger20 says:

    Yes, my mind went to bullying… I don’t like censorship and I agree with your answer.
    The common sense part kicks in.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. msjadeli says:

      Thanks Max 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

  3. One thing that a social media site need to take into account that laws in different countries are different… in most of Europe hate speech is not covered under freedom of speech and it might even be the owner of the site who is responsible for such content…

    Strangely enough social networks have been more eager to censor naked skin than hate speech… so I think at the end of the day I think it should boil down to laws not opinions.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. msjadeli says:

      I agree with you, Bjorn. Where I think it gets tricky is that the laws are often based on subjective opinions of people in control in some way…


  4. It’s an evil trend, for sure.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.